 |
|
|
| Newsletters - View Newsletter: MedaPhase Newsletter September 2006 |
 |
| |
| Newsletters: Latest Issues | Past Issues | List of Articles |
| |
| MedaPhase Newsletter September 2006 |
 |
| |
The Uninsured, the Underinsured and the Almost Insured
W. Rick White, Jr., MBA, FACMPE Chief Executive Officer
A recent article in an area business journal quoted a Census Bureau report announcing that another 1.3 million Americans have been added to the uninsured roles, totaling 46.6 million nationally. Almost all of the increase in the uninsured came from working adults. Although last year’s annual average increase in premiums was 9.2%, the increase followed four consecutive years of double-digit increases. One writer pointed out that it is the low-wage workers who are being hurt the most. Small business owners are responding to these premium increases by dropping their insurance coverage altogether. Another employer response is to off-load more of the cost to employee/patient responsibility. It is facetious to declare that the term “underinsured” is a euphemism for the “almost-insured”, but I will offer an example. Recently it was time for our company to renew our employee health insurance policy. Facing a double-digit premium increase, our response was that of other employers; we converted to a high deductible plan in exchange for the same premium. These plans are known by different descriptors, Health Savings Accounts, Health Reimbursement Accounts, and Consumer Driven Health Plans. When the benefits broker estimated that only 4% of our employees would ever hit the maximum deductible in a year’s time period, it seemed as if our employees were “almost” insured. In fact, we felt compelled to add a cafeteria plan so that the employees could at least get the benefit of some tax savings for medical care. From a medical billing perspective, this is of concern. Most computer billing systems are designed to capture data based on a person’s insurance status. This classification obviously will, over time, be deceptive. More emphasis will be required on measurement to determine what portion of the accounts receivable is due from the insurance company and how much is due directly from the patient. Not only will this have the impact of reducing the overall gross collection rate, it will slow the velocity of the collection cycle. For example, the process starts with billing a patient’s insurance company. A few weeks later, the company either sends payment or states on the Explanation of Benefits (EOB) why payment was denied. With high deductible plans, the EOB will state that the amount billed is within the patient’s deductible. It is following this delay that a bill would finally be sent to the patient/guarantor. There is, however, a glimmer of hope amidst all of this doom and gloom. A major payor is experimenting with a new medical insurance plan in which the insurance company pays the physician the total amount due and then collects co pays and deductibles directly from its members. If a member fails to pay, then the employer will deduct the amount due from the member’s next paycheck. It will be our endeavor to fully support and encourage this development. This seems to be the way it should have been in the first place.
|
 |
| |
Observation Services in the ED
Robert Kottman, M.D., FACEP Medical Director & Legislative Advocate
Observation services are being increasingly provided by emergency physicians, whether within the ED proper or at a different site within the hospital. Observation services may be provided in any bed in any part of the hospital, including the ED. Observation is not a location, but a status.
If an ED bed is to be utilized for provision of observation services, the physician providing observation services must: write initial “Admission to Observation” orders, must periodically enter Progress Notes on the patient must document (a) a physical exam of the patient just prior to discharge from observation status, (b) a discussion of the patient’s observation stay and (c) must write (or otherwise document) all discharge instructions, including prescriptions, referrals, follow-up with the patient’s primary care physician, activity and return to work or school instructions (if applicable), etc.
If the observed patient is a Medicare beneficiary, if the physician bills the initial observation care codes, there must be a medical observation record which contains dated and timed physician admitting orders. The observation record should reflect all the care the patient receives while in observation status, the nursing notes, and the physician’s dated and timed progress notes. The observation services medical record must be in addition to the ED medical record or outpatient clinic record. Medicare requires, for “same day” observation services, i.e. the patient is both admitted and discharged from observation status on the same calendar day—that the patient spend at least 8 hours in observation status. If the patient is admitted to observation on one calendar day and discharged on a different calendar day, then Medicare does not require a minimum length of stay in observation status. Patients may receive a procedure in the ED and then receive observation services from the same physician. Both services will be paid. Of course, the ED Visit codes may not be coded in this instance. The observation services code would be assigned (with a –25 modifier for “significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management services provided on the same day of the procedure or other service”) and the correct CPT code for the procedure would also be coded. Likewise, if a patient receives observation services as well as procedural services (while in observation status) from the same physician (or another physician), then both the observation services and procedural services are coded and reimbursed. For example, an intoxicated patient with a head injury is placed into observation by Dr. A. While in observation , the patient has another seizure and sustains a laceration of his leg, which is repaired by Dr. A. The coder assigns the appropriate observation services code as well as the laceration repair code to Dr. A’s claim and both services will be paid—unless you are contractually prohibited from doing so. The following are the appropriate CPT codes and descriptions for observation services:
For same day observation admit and discharge: 99234 Observation care for problems of low severity with documentation requiring a detailed or comprehensive History, a detailed or comprehensive PE, and straightforward or low complexity MDM (Medical Decision Making).
99235 Observation care for problems of moderate severity. Documentation requires a comprehensive History, a Comprehensive PE, and moderate complexity MDM.
99236 Observation care for problems of high severity. Documentation requires a comprehensive History, a comprehensive PE, and high complexity MDM.
For observation services which span more than one calendar day: 99218 Initial observation care for problems of low severity. Documentation requires a detailed or comprehensive History, a detailed or comprehensive PE and straightforward or low complexity MDM.
99219 Initial observation care for problems of moderate severity. Documentation requires a comprehensive History, and comprehensive PE, and moderate complexity MDM.
99220 Initial observation care for problems of high severity. Documentation requires a comprehensive History, a comprehensive PE, and a high complexity MDM.
99217 Observation care discharge includes services on the date of observation discharge (only to be used on a calendar day other than the initial day of observation). These services include a “final exam”, discussion of the observation stay, all follow-up instructions, and documentation of the patient’s discharge.
RVUs (relative value units) comparing ED E&M Codes Vs. Observation Codes CPT Total RVUs (2006 RVUs) Medicare Pays (Rest of Texas) 99284 2.56 $ 95.35 99285 4.01 $ 149.49 99234 3.58 (Same day admit and discharge) $ 131.80 99235 4.72 (same day admit and discharge) $ 173.83 99236 5.89 (same day admit and discharge) $ 216.84 99217 1.87 (discharge day observation services) $ 68.47 99218 1.78 (Initial day observation services) $ 65.52 99219 2.96 (Initial day observation services) $ 109.02 99220 4.16 (Initial day observation services) $ 153.12 For the codes of 99218, 99219, and 99220, the RVUs are combined with the RVUs for 99217 to obtain the total RVUs when services are provide on more than one calendar day. As can be seen, the RVUs for observation services are higher than those for the ED visit codes of 99284 and 99285. Of note is that the same physician cannot charge for both the ED care and the observation care if he or she provided both services. In this instance, the physician would charge for observation services and forego charging for the ED visit services, since the RVUs are higher for the observation services. If two different physicians in the same specialty or in the same group and one physician provides the ED service and the other provides the observation service, the two physicians are considered to be the same physician for coding and billing purposes—thus either the ED visit services or the observation services may be billed, but not both. If a mid-level practitioner provides the ED care and the ED physician provides the observation care—if both individuals are part of the same group, then either the ED service or the observation service may be coded and billed—but not both. If the ED physician provides ED visit services and the patient subsequently receives observation services from a physician in a different specialty and a different group, then both physicians may bill and receive reimbursement for their services. There are No Procedures that are “Bundled” into Observation Services. Any procedure you provide to a patient in observation status may be separately (and additionally) billed. All payers except Medicare do not place any restrictions on the kinds of problems for which observation patients may receive care and subsequent reimbursement. Medicare continues to reimburse physicians for observation services provided to Medicare beneficiaries regardless of the patient’s diagnosis or medical problem, as long as the services are reasonable and medically necessary. Medicare will only reimburse the hospital for observation services provided to patients with congestive heart failure, asthma or acute chest pain, however. Before providing observation services to a Medicare beneficiary who suffers from a problem “not approved for payment to the hospital by Medicare”, the physician would be well advised to contact the hospital administrative staff for “guidance”—as provision of care in this instance may create a source of friction between the hospital and the physician.
|
 |
| |
Taking a Patient History
Nancy Maguire ACS, CRT, APC, AFC, CPC, CPC-H Associate Director of Coding & Compliance
The three key elements in selecting the appropriate level of E&M code are history, physical examination, and medical decision-making. Medical decision-making (MDM) drives the history and physical exam. These elements must meet or exceed the minimum requirements specified by CPT. When determining the level of history for an E&M code, the documented elements in the History of Present Illness (HPI), Review of Systems (ROS), and/or the Past, Family, Social History (PFSH) determine the level of history performed. Documentation Requirements:The type of patient history depends on the nature of the presenting problems and includes some or all of the following elements: the chief complaint; the history of the present illness; the review of systems; and the past, family and/or social history. History of Present Illness (HPI):Is it brief or extended? Depends on how many checkmarks you can check–not on how long it takes. If you have 4 or more of 7 components described (location, quality, severity, duration, timing, context, modifying factors), it’s extended; come up one short, you’re sunk.: brief only. Review of Systems (ROS): The following systems will be recognized as part of the ROS: constitutional symptoms (e.g., fever, weight loss, vital signs); eyes, ears, nose, mouth and throat; cardiovascular; respiratory; gastrointestinal; genitourinary; musculoskeletal; integumentary (skin and/or breast); neurological; psychiatric; endocrine; hematologic/lymphatic; and allergic/immunologic. There are three types of ROS: * For the problem-pertinent ROS, your documentation must show the patient's positive responses and pertinent negatives for the system related to the problem identified in the HPI.
* For the extended ROS, your documentation must show the patient's positive responses and pertinent negatives for two to nine systems related to the problem or problems identified in HPI.
* For the complete ROS, your documentation must show that at least 10 organ systems have been reviewed. Those systems with positive or pertinent negative responses must be individually documented. For the remaining systems, a notation indicating all other systems are negative is permissible. In the absence of such a notation, at least 10 systems must be individually documented.
Past, Family, and Social History: * For a pertinent PFSH, your documentation must include at least one specific item from any of these three history areas.
* For a complete PFSH, your documentation must include at least 2 of the 3 (past, family, social).
Note: A patient’s past history cannot be utilized in the ROS or HPI elements.
Putting it all together: Problem Focused History: If you have a brief or extended HPI, but no ROS and PFSH, you have a problem focused history. 99281 (history)
Expanded Problem Focused History: If you have a brief or extended HPI, problem pertinent ROS, and no PFSH, you have an expanded problem focused history. 99282 or 99283 (history)
Detailed History: If you have an extended HPI, extended ROS, and pertinent PFSH, you have a detailed history. 99284 (history)
Comprehensive History: If you have an extended HPI, complete ROS, and complete PFSH, you have a comprehensive history. 99285 (history)
The types of HPI, ROS and PFSH you document will help determine the level of E/M service we can report. For instance, when considering a comprehensive encounter, we cannot have a brief history of present illness documented, unless the “caveat” exists.
|
 |
| |
Featured Consultant: Irma Nin, M.D.
Evidence Based Clinical Orders Emergency Departments are increasingly being forced by their administration to focus on improving “Through-Put” times. One of the areas that can positively impact this goal is the streamlining of the ordering process. Dr. Irma Nin, M.D., an emergency physician from Venice, Florida has developed, both from experience and published literature, an Evidence Based cost effective system for the ordering process. Her expertise has shown that training triage nurses to use physician-determined criteria allows appropriate testing to be performed and the results to be ready in many cases in time for the physician’s first interaction with the patient. The Triage Nurse is trained to take the History, perform a basic “hands on” exam, and then, based on the findings, implement a set of standardized standing orders. Some of the areas that lend themselves to this concept include: Congestive Heart Failure and G.I. Bleeding. Risks involved with establishing and using these standards are reduced because they are all based on published evidence. At each facility where she consults, Dr. Nin works with the group and the nurses to develop individualized protocols for that facility. She then trains the nurses to implement the process, which in most cases includes developing a comfortable level with the performance of the “hands on” exam. You are welcome to visit with Dr. Nin to discuss her ideas at Booth # 1512 at the ACEP Scientific Assembly in New Orleans, October 15-17, 2006. You can also contact Dr. Nin by leaving her a message at www.medaphase.net.
|
 |
| |
Coding Corner: Documentation of Laceration Repairs
Single Layer Closures: With a single layer closure, please document carefully for the work being done and state the length of the wound in cms. Intermediate Upgrade: If the wound is heavily contaminated requiring extensive cleaning or removal of foreign matter it can be coded and billed as an Intermediate Laceration repair instead of a simple repair. Complex Laceration: Coding and Billing for a complex laceration requires documentation of layered suturing of torn, crushed or deeply lacerated tissue. Debridement by removing foreign material or damaged tissue must be documented, and may include margin revision. Please remember to include the length of the wound in cms. Make sure to document each layer closure and how many layers were closed. All laceration repairs must state the kind of suture material used in the repair.
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|